Not Going Vegetarian, But Cutting Down on Meat? There’s a Name for That

Posted by Mike Confino, January 4, 2015

There are at least four reasons people are trying to cut down on meat: their health, the environment and the treatment of animals and workers. Not everyone gets a pang in their heart when they see how today’s factory farms treat “animal units,” but no one today actually thinks meat is good for you. The best that cancer and heart groups will say about meat is it is not too harmful if you seriously limit portions. Yet, to produce a less-than-healthful food product, an industry is tolerated that contributes to global warming, water pollution and fish kills, appalling and often underreported worker abuse and animal abuse and even harm to the economy. It is no secret the U.S. government enables low meat prices to help the meat sector while telling us to abstain from meat and dumping meat on the poor. During the recession of 2009, the National Association of State Departments of Agriculture rolled out a “Meat the Need” plan to dump what it called the “oversupply” of meat on SNAP recipients.

via Not Going Vegetarian, But Cutting Down on Meat? There’s a Name for That | Alternet.

  1. gvillefarmfresh Says:

    Not Going Vegetarian, But Cutting Down on Meat? There’s a Name for That: There are at least four reasons people… http://t.co/oHFM0ruBjX

Recent Headlines